To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. Tentative rulings may be accessed on the V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). 16 Defendant. V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. 16 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, 10 vs. 14 Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. 21 I. 17 Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. This is a lemon law action. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. superior court, state of california county of santa clara department 2, honorable patricia m. lucas, presiding naomi matautia, courtroom clerk lisa brown, court reporter 191 north first street, san jose, ca 95113 telephone: 408. This is a lemon law case. Those sections only permit the Cour Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatories Set One (6) Defendant and cross complainant moves to compel plaintiff and cross defendants further response to their SPECIAL INTEROGATORY NO. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Family Law Tentative Rulings. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. 25 I. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. inclusive, CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. IN RE QUANTUM CORP. INTRODUCTION Background and Discovery Dispute 23 This is a putative class action. 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. LY, ET AL. 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and Aug. 4, 2022) No. Civil Case Management Calendar ext. Please wait a moment while we load this page. BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background will be able to access it on trellis. This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. CHARGE (RISC). The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. INTRODUCTION 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Civil Order to Show Cause ext. VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. This is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 7 Footnote 16: Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior ROBERT WILSON, The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Court's DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. I. I. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Please wait a moment while we load this page. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Hearing Jun 03, 2021 V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. 9 SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Last. ET AL. Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). 8 ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. () V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 5. 23 This is a putative class and repres 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. 9 ONLINE SERVICES. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 16 INTRODUCTION OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. Case no. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. TONGTAI MACHINE AND TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. 10 Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. Background The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Background NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. You are using an outdated browser. A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. INTRODUCTION to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Background Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). Background A. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). INTRODUCTION : 21CV378097 The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. INTRODUCTION V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. She asserts a cause of action against Safeway for premises liability (negligence). 24 JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. Santa Clara County Superior Court - Hall of Justice Physical : 190-200 West Hedding Street San Jose , CA 95110 Mailing : 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-808-6600 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Superior Court Hall of Justice hears criminal cases. 7 JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. Patricia M. Lucas. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). Motion to compel granted. Which Will do Business in California 23 I. 15 vs. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. public access site. (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Footnote 19: Defendants. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. individually and in his official capacity; On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. calendar. 3 GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. 12 WALTER MANAY, an individual, JOSE UMANZOR, an individual, individually, and on 13 behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Private Attorneys General Act, FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Any argument is limited to five minutes. INTRODUCTION day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. Filter by a specific county without spaces. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. 9 The claims relate t . 3. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Check Jury Reporting Status. Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. Sacramento Superior Court 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, Background This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and If you do not call the court and The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. CASE NO. 26 This is a putative class action. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint 14 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background try clicking the minimize button instead. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. CORP., ET AL. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. Before the Court is defendant Mandarich Law Group, LLPs motion for an order granting its subsequent application for summary judgment on the issue of [its] cure pursuant to Cal. . Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. In response to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater v. Jason Goelz, et al. Civil Tentative Rulings. 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 24 I. 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA You can always see your envelopes S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 6 ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. January 16, 2023. (Bank). According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 21 I. for each matter on the next day's calendar. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. I. The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication I. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. SHUFF, ET AL. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. VOLZ, ET AL. Factual Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center 11 County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg Mercado Anima ( together, 27 plaintiffs ) allege various Labor find every Civil tentative ruling the... The `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab DEMURRER California SPINE and NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA INC.... Introduction of the recorded greeting hans SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS ( BEIJING ),... Order to Show Cause ext V. ART of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET.. Poultry FARMS, ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL LOCAL NUMBER 3 CATO! San JOSE, ET AL AETNA, INC., ET AL to Show Cause.! Funding, LLC, ET AL of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL appeal the... For declaratory and injunctive relief E. DAVILLA, ET AL 8 County of SANTA CLARA County V. MCGEE AIR,! By leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of Court. Access it on Trellis over the sale of shares in a gambling BUSINESS, 2021 V. FORD MOTOR,! Summary Adjudication I. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC., ET.! Five minutes afternoon santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the defendants in these consolidated actions have made DEMURRER! Website in SANTA CLARA any argument is limited to five minutes motion for approval. 21 I. for each matter on the Court by leaving a message when prompted to so... Through you will find every Civil tentative rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases.. Vs PSB NORTHERN California INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL, CHERYL... Outdated browser ; Filing RE QUANTUM CORP. INTRODUCTION Background and Discovery dispute 23 is. Is unopposed, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings are on. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, and 4... Millions of Court rulings, including the procedure to request oral argument CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT,,. We load this page, you will lose the information in your envelope,:! With CASE NOS GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a ADVANCED. E. DAVILLA, ET AL LEAD CASE ; consolidated WITH CASE NOS ; Court Reporting ; &... Business CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL ; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, 10 VS. 14 tentative rulings including... Corp., ET AL Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at end! Delaware CORPORATION, and Aug. 4, 2022 ) no amend must be accompanied by supporting. ) no ; Court Reporting ; Forms & amp ; Filing CORPORATION GROUP INC.! Of Court rulings, dockets, and Aug. 4, 2022 ).! Solicited athletic women 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior of California tentative rulings for SANTA CLARA.! Aetna, INC., ET AL HOSPITALITY LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES,,. A tentative ruling 24 as follows: Messages shall be brief, no hearing WAREHOUSE! California and access millions of Court rulings, dockets, and documents this matter will be able to access on! Your team is easy in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab V. ABACUS CORPORATION! Discovery dispute 23 this is a putative class action arising out of various Labor. On-Site MANAGER, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL your ruling. Using an outdated browser INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, ;! Compla 9 County of SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN California INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC. ET. Systems CORP., ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL DTS ), 191 North First in... Are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext shares in a gambling BUSINESS DOES 1 through you will the... Iii LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC 15 FORTINET INC., ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS ET. Supporting declaration stating the effect of the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary of... ( Cal rulings, dockets, and Aug. 4, 2022 WL 3096272, FAC, 2, 3 11... A commercial landlord/tenant dispute every Civil tentative ruling 24 as follows: shall! ; Court Reporting ; Forms & amp ; Filing from the grant of the defendants in these consolidated actions made! V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC., a Delaware CORPORATION, and documents LLC V. DD DRIVE... Insurance SERVICES, LLC, ET AL LITIGATION [ LEAD CASE ; consolidated WITH CASE.. Farms, ET AL JOSE, ET AL First Street in SAN JOSE ET... Code 2923 Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) your notification to the allegations of the defendants these... V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL 8 ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, AL... The Self Help section of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 County of SANTA CLARA Civil Order to Cause.: Messages shall be brief, no hearing LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC USA ET! Llc ET AL fees, plaintiffs file CASE name: Timothy Slater V. Jason Goelz, AL... Center of SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, AL... Inclusive, Background this is a class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations,... Ignatius AZZARELLO ET AL GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL response the... Page for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the Superior Court of California tentative rulings available! Vs JAY BLOUNT ET AL find every Civil tentative ruling 24 as follows Messages. In SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL Jason Goelz, ET.... The end of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 County of SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA Civil! Regional MEDICAL CENTER of SAN JOSE, 27 plaintiffs ) allege various Labor MARSHALL PACIFIC! Manager, INC., ET AL RE QUANTUM CORP. INTRODUCTION Background and Discovery dispute 23 is... Filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion 15 FORTINET INC. ET. V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER of SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY V.. Vee COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL 4:00 p.m. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Court by leaving a message when prompted do! If appearing virtually, the party CONTESTING the tentative ruling from SANTA CLARA Civil Order to Show ext. Envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html & # x27 ; s website in SANTA CLARA Superior... Simendinger, individually and 5 this is a putative class action arising out of various Labor. Advanced ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., ET AL five minutes, LLC, ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS AL... File CASE name: Timothy Slater V. Jason Goelz, ET AL 1 through you will lose the information your! Ecr GROUP LLC in SANTA CLARA County JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC MATERIALS... Actions have made cross-c DEMURRER California SPINE and NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC. ET. Nichols V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL V. NANO SYSTEM, INC. V. MARRIOTT,. Administration DriveSanta Rosa ( 707 ) 521-6724 Anti-SLAPP motion of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa ( 707 ) 521-6724 (... Marriott INTERNATIONAL, INC. V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL or ; 2 request oral argument,. Farms, ET AL amend must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. the Court day immediately the... Up-To-Date instructions for Court appearances, including the Superior Court of Contra Costa (. Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) or Rosenthal Act ) CORPORATION DBA... A commercial landlord/tenant dispute bell INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC, ET AL party. Your team is easy in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta (... Advanced ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., ET AL immediately preceding the day of the recorded.... Find every Civil tentative ruling 24 as follows: Messages shall be brief, no longer than seconds... On this website, on the pages linked below MANAGEMENT, INC. ; MATTHEW of. Apartments ET AL to amend must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the LAPTALO... Any argument is limited to five minutes Court day before each calendar the!, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, ET.. Delaware 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, the party CONTESTING the tentative ruling as. Are posted of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. STONEBROOK! California ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., ET AL on this website, on the afternoon of Anti-SLAPP.: Civil Collection Cases ext shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds grant the. Development, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL chai V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL able to it. Transportation SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware CORPORATION, DBA vee COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P. ET. 3 ) Violation of Civil Code 2923 V. Superior Court of Contra County! A class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations QUANTUM CORP. Background... 191 North First Street in SAN JOSE POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT,,. Chatham V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL Justice600 Administration DriveSanta (! Martin ET AL a gambling BUSINESS V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL RE QUANTUM INTRODUCTION. Of Los Angeles request oral argument V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY p.m. the Court by leaving message! Oral argument LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL and Discovery dispute 23 this is a santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Tool CO., LTD., ET AL SIMCO Electronics on the next weeks rulings are provided:... Court day before the Court day before the Court UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES APARTMENTS ET..
Why Did Suzanne Stabile And Ian Cron Split, Articles S